In a candid moment on ESPN’s “College GameDay,” renowned analyst Kirk Herbstreit expressed his disappointment with the College Football Playoff (CFP) committee’s selection process. Herbstreit’s comments came after Indiana’s lackluster performance against Notre Dame in the first round of the tournament.
Indiana, with an 11-win season, secured a spot in the CFP despite having a soft schedule. Their only notable game was against Ohio State, where they suffered a 38-15 defeat. Herbstreit argued that Indiana’s inclusion in the playoff was undeserved, stating that they were “outclassed” and “physically” not equipped to compete with other teams.
Herbstreit emphasized the need for the CFP committee to reassess its selection criteria, prioritizing the “best 12 teams” over those with impressive win-loss records but weak schedules. He asserted that the committee’s current approach is “a bunch of BS” and that it’s essential to identify the most deserving teams, rather than simply rewarding those with a high number of wins.
The analyst’s comments sparked a debate about the CFP selection process and its potential flaws. While Indiana had a remarkable season, their lack of competitiveness against top-tier teams raises questions about their inclusion in the playoff.
As the College Football Playoff continues, fans and analysts alike will be watching closely to see how the committee’s selections play out. With several exciting matchups scheduled for Saturday, including SMU vs. Penn State and Ohio State vs. Tennessee, the stakes are high, and the competition is fierce.
Herbstreit’s comments serve as a reminder that the CFP selection process is not perfect and that there is room for improvement. As the college football landscape continues to evolve, it’s essential to reexamine the criteria used to determine the most deserving teams and ensure that the playoff field represents the best of the best.